This sexist passage in the Bible from Saint Paul (1 Corinthians 11) has harmed women’s position in marriage/society/Christianity for 2000 years. Here I flip it on its head, swapping “man” for “woman” words: it feels great being the favoured gender in the Bible, for a change!

Saint Paulina writes: Now I want you to realize that the head of every woman is Julia Christ, and the head of the man is woman, and the head of Julia Christ is our Lady God. Every woman who prays or prophesies with her head covered dishonors her head. And every man who prays or prophesies with his head uncovered dishonors his head—it is just as though his head were shaved. If a man does not cover his head, he should have his hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a man to have his hair cut or shaved off, he should cover his head. A woman ought not to cover her head, since she is the image and glory of God; but the man is the glory of woman. For woman did not come from man, but man from woman; neither was woman created for man, but man for woman. For this reason, and because of the angels, the man ought to have a sign of authority on his head.

Us women need to know WE EXIST as much as guys do in society, and in the world. 

We need to SEE WOMEN as often as we see men in all areas of society

We need to know WE ARE AS IMPORTANT as guys are. 

We need to know that we are AS NECESSARY to all aspects of society as guys are.

We need to know that OUR VOICES ARE HEARD as frequently as guys voices.

We need AS MANY GREAT FEMALE ROLE MODELS in the media and in the public as guys have (by “media” I include film, books, TV, music/singers/bands – by “public” I include politicians).

We need to know that we are NOT OTHER

We need to know that we are NOT PERIPHERAL to society (any longer),

Instead, we need to know that we are EQUALLY CENTRAL in every aspect of society as men are.

That MEN and MALE are NOT THE NORM

The male voice needs to be seen no longer the generic gender-neutral voice of “human-kind” but as a gendered male voice the same way as the female voice is  seen as a gendered female voice.

1. “female” and our concept of “feminine” are not considered worse or inferior to ”male” or our concept of ”masculine”. It is as cool, and as okay, to be female and to be feminine as it is to be a boy or to be masculine.

2. Women are equally central to society as men are. This means no more sexist language (eg. using “he” to mean “she or he”. Alternatively use the word ”they” as a gender-neutral singular, or else, half the time say/write the word “she” instead of ”he”). Female characters have as many main roles, and as many good roles, as male characters on movies or TV, and in books. Men and women in general listen to and like music by female singers as much as they like/listen to music by male singers.

3. the hyper-sexualisation, reproduction and consumption of the female body is heavily reduced. The female body is treated a lot less like property. Being hot, attractive or beautiful is no longer so important to women, it is no longer what gives them their value.

4. all degrading and violent porn, and child porn, is made illegal and this is enforced - it is made illegal to produce or distribute this type of porn; and the courts and the police crack down extremely harshly on offenders = first by caring enough to seek out offenders/investigate shops selling porn; and secondly by sentencing all offenders very harshly. Police no longer ignore/turn a blind eye to this type of porn. I include in this type of porn: rape fantasies, gang-bangs, and “school-girl-porn-star” fantasies (eg. where the porn star is wearing clothes that resemble parts of a school uniform).

5. Prostitution is decriminalised only for the prostitutes, and never for the johns. And the police actively search out johns. And the johns face harsh penalties.

6. strip clubs no longer exist.

My family starting talking about feminism a few months ago, and someone asked whether each of us considered ourselves a feminist. Surprised, I said, “of course!” and so did my Mum. But my Dad and brothers wouldn’t call themselves feminists because they thought feminism wasn’t useful anymore because society was no longer sexist. This completely shocked me – to learn that my brother’s thought there wasn’t a shred of sexism in society today. I had felt the complete opposite for a long time, and it seemed obvious to me that much of society was still sexist to a degree.

A man’s opinion on whether sexism still exists in society is in general much less relevant than a women’s opinion on whether society is still sexist.

THE MAN who says society is not sexist is commenting without personal experience . He isn’t affected by (most) sexism at all so he doesn’t have to notice it. He also has a strong personal stake in not noticing sexism. If sexism exists in society, that means he and/or his male friends are sexist (in some ways). That threatens him. He knows he is a good person, really, and that he tries in every way to treat women as well as he treats men. He feels a personal attack if anyone stimulates the possibility that any part of society can still be “sexist”. This prejudices him against noticing sexism, and against accepting that certain acts/situations are sexist. He often doesn’t consciously know he is prejudiced in this way – his prejudice against there being sexism is subconscious. This man thinks a lot less than a woman does about whether something is sexist or not. He rarely thinks about sexism, or about things that might be sexist. This is because he has a personal stake (self-pride) in not noticing sexism. This is also because as a man, sexism hardly affects him, so he simply doesn’t need to bother thinking about it.

THE WOMAN by contrast, when she says there is sexism in society is commenting based on her personal experience. She  is victimised by the sexism so she notices it easily, and experiences it much more intensely than the man will. She is more sensitive to noticing sexism because it deeply affects her. Because of this she will think much more about situations and whether they are sexist or not. She will notice sexism – if it exists – more readily than a man would.

 

Some very distant relatives came over today. I’d only met them once before. One of them (a friendly old man), after we’d introduced ourselves to each other, asked me,

> “How’s it going with your boyfriend?” (playfully assuming that “of course” I must have a boyfriend, to make me feel good about myself). I replied,

> “What boyfriend?” And he said,

> “How can a pretty little girl like you not have a boyfriend?” Unsure what to say, I just smiled, embarrased. And the conversation came to a dead end.

FIVE REASONS WHY THIS CONVERSATION MADE ME FUME

1.  he assumed I want a boyfriend (he assumed all young women hate being single and want boyfriends). That we hate being independent. That we can’t enjoy being single/unattached. He assumed that we derive our primarily value from our value to guys (eg. from whether guys are attracted to us, or from whether we have a boyfriend who loves us).

2. he assumed that the main (only?) thing that guys consider when deciding whether to ask us out is whether we are attractive. If that is true, it hardly makes me want to date guys ever.

3. he basically told me that my primary value (to society and to myself) and measure of success in life was whether I had “succeeded” in getting a boyfriend (not in eg. my University grades, career…). And he told me that to achieve this success in life I must be beautiful. He told me that being beautiful is what would get me what I wanted in life (and that what I wanted was boyfriend + children).

4. he complimented me on being “pretty”. But I know I am just average looking, and when people comment on how I look it makes me self-conscious. It makes me aware of just how much how I look matters to them, and to society. And to my perceived chance of “future success” in life. Which, to a plain looking lady, is very worrying. I can’t do anything about how I look, but I can sort the more important parts of myself/my life out! How I look is so trivial and meaningless it makes me scared and angry when someone tells me once again how important it is for women.

5. this man would never have asked an obviously ugly young women about whether she had a boyfriend or not. To him, he would see this as pointing out her “unfortunate luck with looks”, and putting his foot in it. So it makes me very uncomfortable that he will compliment me for my plain luck in looking ‘good’. It sets me apart from those who ‘don’t', and emphasises just how important this thing to do with genes and not our hard work is.

  NOT A PRETTY LITTLE GIRL

I also didn’t appreciate the “little girl” after the word “pretty” in this man’s compliment to me. It assumes to be sufficiently pretty to get a boyfriend, one has to be small/slim and young. It assumes we have to be little and “cute”. It seems infantilizing/belittling. I don’t want to be “cute” or a “girl” – I want to be an adult!

This man who had that conversation with me is a nice man. He is a normal man. He was simply trying to be friendly, encouraging, funny and kind. Even a man like that can say things that are sexist (even through trying to be nice, even without knowing his words were sexist).

 I DON’T WANT A BOYFRIEND right now.  I don’t have a boyfriend. I don’t want a boyfriend (at least for now/near future). I am very happy without a boyfriend. I am not miserable or lonely. I hardly think about not having a boyfriend.

EXPLAINING MY BLOG TITLE

I am sick of women who are no longer girls still being called girls.

Boys when they get older are called guys. This word can be used for males of any age, and it is unconnected with the child word “boy”.

We don’t have a similar “casual” word to use for women. So instead we use “girls”. I have heard one person say the word “gals” serves this purpose: however this word is obviously taken off of the child word “girls” so it is still connecting women with girls. It is also an exclusively American word, we don’t use it where I live. 

Why I think women are still called “girls” after we become adults =  females are not supposed to mature. We are more valuable in this society (to men) if we stay young, and sexy/attractive. We are supposed to be a bit sillier, too. Not as intelligent as our husbands, and not as serious. We can (and should) spend a good amount of time making ourselves look “cute” and sexy (for the men). We wear clothes that make us look smaller, we sit “smaller” than men (legs together/crossed), and we generally try to make ourselves look slimmer/littler/petite. Like a girl. So we look good to guys. In contrast, boys are encouraged to “man-up” and become a man quickly, it is good for them to mature. They aren’t supposed to continue looking like boys, if they do they will be effeminate men, who are ‘less’ than real men.

Calling us women ”girls” is a way to belittle us, talk down to us, treat us as less important. It is patronising.

We are women. We are ladies. We are adults.

- Using the word “girl” for a girlfriend just plain seems creepy. Along with calling one’s girlfriend “baby”. Particularly along with saying, “come to daddy!” (do people ever say that in real life or just on TV? That sounds seriously creepy).

- The sex industry almost always calls it’s female workers “girls”. I absolutely hate that. I understand that for some bizarre reason “girl” is a sexier term than “woman”. But “Ladies” is sexy too, and it shows that the sex worker women are adults, and that they should be respected (not belittled).

IF WE’RE NOT ‘GIRLS’ WHAT ARE WE? WHAT DO WE CALL OURSELVES? = The word “lady” is one possible alternative. The word “lady” used to be used for only upper class white women – and today is still used more for white, well-off women than for non-white or poor women, I think. So using the word “ladies” to refer to all women may be problematic. The word “woman” is better. The only ‘problem’ with the word “woman” is that it is considered sexless, unsexy, boring, prudish, old, plain, and ugly.  The word “girl” is seen as sexy. But that is creepy to me, that it has to be like that. “Woman” should be considered sexy, not “girl”! We need to change this.